US Treasury yields: Oil returns larger

The 10-year Treasury Department The yield initially rose before falling on Monday as oil prices initially rose above $100 a barrel, then later fell after President Donald Trump told a CBS News reporter that the Iran war could soon be over.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell more than 2 basis points to 4.109%, and the 30-year Treasury yield fell more than 3 basis points to 4.721%. The two-year Treasury yield was little changed at 3.557%.

One basis point is equal to 0.01%, and yields and prices move in opposite directions.

“I think the war is pretty much over,” Trump said, according to a post on X by Weijia Jiang, senior White House correspondent for CBS News. “They have no navy, no communications, they have no air force.”

After these comments were shared, oil prices fell in extended trading. West Texas Intermediate crude, which hit a high of $119.48 in overnight trading, was last at nearly $87 a barrel and global benchmark Brent was at $91 a barrel. The two had settled higher in the regular session.

The earlier rise in oil prices in the wake of the Iran war has raised fears that rising energy costs could lead to a broader rise in inflation. Some even predict that $100 a barrel could lead to a global recession.

“The market is a little in disbelief,” Warren Pies, co-founder and strategist at 3Fourteen Research, said on CNBC’s “Money Movers,” noting that the market is currently worried about inflation and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate outlook. “It’s probably rational, but basically everything here is priced in for a quick change, and that includes the bond market.”

The rise in oil prices came after Iran, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates cut oil production after the Strait of Hormuz was effectively closed due to the war that began on February 28.

The group of seven energy ministers will meet virtually early Tuesday to discuss a possible release of oil reserves to combat supply disruptions.

If there is no response and millions of barrels per day are effectively ignored, oil prices will have to rise “to a level that starts to dampen demand and ration that, and that is recessionary,” Pies added. “I think the first indication that we’re at this point in the economy will be [Treasury] Yields begin to decline.

Less immediately, investors expect a busy week of economic data, including February inflation data on Wednesday, followed by January’s personal consumption expenditures index and JOLT job vacancies numbers on Friday.

Federal Reserve officials are in a pre-meeting lockdown ahead of their two-day meeting to decide interest rate policy, scheduled for March 17 and 18.

—CNBC’s Eamon Javers and Spencer Kimball contributed to this report

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

FDA’s vaccine chief will resign in April after a sequence of controversial choices

The Food and Drug Administration logo is seen before a news conference at Health and Human Services headquarters in Washington, April 22, 2025.

Nathan Posner | Anadolu | Getty Images

A key U.S. Food and Drug Administration official who oversees vaccines and biotechnology treatments will resign from the agency after several decisions that raised concerns in the industry.

Vinay Prasad, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, will leave the FDA at the end of April, an agency spokesman confirmed Friday. It is his second resignation from the position: He briefly left the post in July after backlash over his regulatory decisions, and returned just two weeks later in August.

In a post on Makary, Prasad said “achieved tremendous things” during his tenure at the agency.

Prasad’s decision to resign came after increasing criticism of the FDA from the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, as well as from former health officials. According to RTW Investments, the agency rejected or discouraged approval applications for at least eight drugs last year after delving into the data the companies used to support their applications. The FDA initially refused to review Moderna’s flu shot, but later changed course.

All of these companies accused the FDA of reversing previous guidance on the evidence they could use to support their applications, sparking industry criticism that an unreliable regulatory process could hamper the development of drugs for hard-to-treat diseases.

A former FDA official, who spoke to CNBC on condition of anonymity to speak freely on the topic, called the retractions the worst kind of regulatory uncertainty because companies say they are told one thing and then experience another.

In a statement earlier Friday, an FDA spokesperson said there is “no regulatory uncertainty,” adding that the agency “makes decisions based on the evidence but makes no representations about the results.” The spokesperson said the FDA “conducts rigorous, independent reviews and does not agree with the approvals.”

The latest controversy arose after the FDA advised against it UniQure disqualified from applying for accelerated approval of its experimental treatment for Huntington’s disease.

The agency, which made staff cuts and reorganization under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has faced broader backlash for its approval process for drugs and vaccines. Critics fear the agency could hinder the development of new treatments and endanger patient safety.

Criticism of Prasad had been mounting, reaching a peak when the FDA’s Makary appeared to criticize UniQure’s gene therapy for Huntington’s disease in an interview with CNBC’s Becky Quick last week. Makary did not name UniQure but described his treatment.

At a CNBC Cures event this week, calls for restructuring grew even louder.

The Wall Street Journal first reported Prasad’s departure.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Within the booming enterprise of wellness golf equipment and third areas

A few years ago, Grace Guo began to long for places in New York City where hanging out with friends didn’t necessarily have to involve alcohol.

Guo was newly sober and surrounded by friends who also didn’t want to drink. She said she wanted alternatives to the typical social scene. After some research, she landed on Bathhouse and Othership: social wellness clubs that aim to create communities to improve health.

“Honestly, it just feels like going to a spa together and spending an afternoon together. I think for me it just feels a lot better than staying out late at night,” Guo told CNBC.

She is one of a growing number of people who are turning to membership clubs and other places designed to maintain health while also serving as a place to foster connections.

And these spaces are also developing into booming companies. Bathhouse, which opened in Brooklyn, New York in 2019, told CNBC exclusively that it expects run-rate sales of around $120 million by the end of this year. It declined to disclose its other financial information, as did Othership.

Many of these companies are privately owned, but the listed fitness studio chain Life Time also began to focus more on premium wellness a few years ago. While investors initially didn’t like this redistribution of resources, it is now paying off: Life Time shares have more than doubled since October 2023.

Companies old and new are trying to reach consumers like Guo. The 31-year-old said she has noticed an increasing focus on health, well-being and peace in her own social life and those around her, as she seeks so-called third spaces with this focus.

“I’m wondering: Where can I try to join a community, or where can I go to express a particular interest that I have and find like-minded people?” Guo said. “It’s about finding a group of like-minded people, but then also having the space and novelty to try something or pursue something.”

At Othership, Guo said the environment of health-focused socializing between the sauna, the cold bath and choosing a popular time slot in the evening appealed to her.

“It’s really important to have a space where we can go to break ourselves out of our routine and complacency, and I think the most important thing is probably just the fact that it overcomes a lot of the inertia of doing something,” Guo said.

“Loneliness is an epidemic”

Bathhouse pools

Source: Bathhouse

The concept of third spaces is not new. The term was first coined by sociologist Ray Oldenburg in his 1989 book “The Great Good Place” and refers to spaces outside of home, or the first place, and work, the second place, where people come together and build relationships.

This definition included places such as neighborhood cafes, libraries, bars, and more where people of different backgrounds came together in an informal setting with relatively low barriers to entry.

But sometime in recent years, this definition has evolved and the importance of third spaces has increased.

Richard Kyte, a professor at Viterbo University in Wisconsin and author of “Finding Your Third Place,” said he has been teaching courses on third places for nearly two decades but has only noticed the term becoming mainstream in recent years.

That tipping point, Kyte said, also coincided with the pandemic, which put the world into lockdown and virtually eliminated social gatherings for a time but redefined them in the long term.

“During this time, we suddenly started talking more about the cost of loneliness, the cost of social isolation. During the pandemic, we realized that’s not healthy,” Kyte told CNBC. “And at the same time that we realized we needed these places more, we saw so many of them closing. That sparked a new interest.”

It’s a trend also reinforced by an increasingly digital society, he added, as younger generations crave more than just social media connections despite the rise of artificial intelligence and chatbots.

“We’ve made all these huge investments in technology that make it easier and more desirable to be independent,” Kyte said, pointing to AI companies that promote products masquerading as friends. “If we have people turning more to their screens rather than seeking fulfillment through social interaction, all of those people are just going to be taken out of the pool.”

According to Cigna’s 2025 Loneliness in America report, 67% of Gen Zers and 65% of Millennials reported feeling lonely. A 2024 Harvard survey found that 67% of adults experience social and emotional loneliness because they do not belong to a meaningful group.

Harry Taylor initially founded Othership with his wife and friends to create a space that embraced the wellness trend while combating isolation.

“We understand that there is a huge market for meeting other people. Loneliness is an epidemic right now,” Taylor told CNBC. “We realized that just by doing that, people could come together and just be themselves and be vulnerable.”

What is old is new

Third rooms have evolved to encompass specific purposes, justifying the price often associated with them, with some membership clubs earning thousands of dollars per month.

Wellness, in particular, has boomed recently, becoming one of the top gifting categories this past holiday season. Equinox CEO Harvey Spevak told CNBC last month that “health is the new luxury,” with the global wellness market expected to reach nearly $10 trillion by 2030, according to estimates from the Global Wellness Institute.

Bathhouse, which operates 90,000 square foot facilities in New York City, offers a wellness experience based on Europe’s bathhouse heritage. The space features saunas and cold dives, both guided and unguided, starting at $40 for a trial session. The company’s two New York locations serve around 1,000 customers every day.

“It was really obvious that there wasn’t a bathhouse-like concept that was truly aimed at a modern consumer, especially in America,” co-founder Travis Talmadge told CNBC.

Talmadge said he and his co-founder focused on creating a human experience, touching everyone’s body while building a community around the shared activities.

“Our spaces are really large in scale, so the nice thing about it is that everyone feels like a background actor on set where there are just so many people moving around,” Talmadge said. “You can have this really personal time, either alone or with someone else, but then you’re in an environment where a lot of people are doing the same thing.”

Talmadge said the company has seen “excess demand” and is operating at a “very healthy margin” and plans to open seven more locations by 2027.

It is just one of many wellness areas that are becoming increasingly popular.

Othership also draws on a wellness mindset, integrating practices from different cultures to address the “physical, mental, emotional and spiritual.” The company has locations in New York and Canada and plans further growth.

At Othership, members can choose between three options: a free-flow session, which allows members to use the space as they wish; Courses that alternate between saunas and cold dives with group-led activities; and social gatherings, imitating clubs without alcohol in order to be present.

Co-founder Taylor said that through Othership, he has seen customers create new friend groups, propose to their partners in the sauna, and find belonging with others while strengthening their own health.

Creating alcohol-free spaces was one of the Othership founders’ goals when developing the vision. Othership now hosts comedians, live musicians and more in its saunas, replicating similar spaces found in big cities that are often associated with alcohol.

“There is so much social media that gives us the false impression of social engagement and interaction, but so many of us have found ourselves doomscrolling to almost do the opposite,” Taylor said. “As we all need social saturation as humans, a gap is created. Therefore, it is coming together and genuinely interacting with each other that truly creates a deep sense of belonging.”

Building community

Glo30 Skin Care Studio.

Courtesy: Arleen Lamba

Wellness communities can also emerge in other ways. Glo30, a membership studio founded 13 years ago with locations across the country, offers members personalized skin care treatments every 30 days and creates a coordinated schedule with other members to foster community.

“Building community is not just about achieving results [feeling] good, but also being able to have common experiences and share their feelings,” Arleen Lamba, founder and CEO of Glo30, told CNBC.

While urban cities like New York and Los Angeles are seeing a boom in wellness clubs, Lamba says their more than 100 locations represent the in-between, in places like Texas, Arizona, North Carolina and elsewhere.

Each Glo30 appointment is scheduled on the hour at each location to create more opportunities for social connection, Lamba said.

“When people come into the studio, they leave the studio, and we see that they would recognize each other and actually make new friends,” she said, adding that the company has seen more and more social groups forming in the treatment rooms, especially after the pandemic.

Lamba said she has observed that the desire for social connection has increased with the advent of social media, but that creating community can often happen in unconventional places like Glo30. At the same time, this social interaction is not as “overwhelming” as other venues such as parties or large group events, allowing for an intimate social gathering, she said.

Lamba said Glo30’s number of franchise units in development has increased by 67.5% over the past two years as demand for its services has increased.

But the boom in third spaces also goes beyond wellness. Exclusive restaurant memberships, gyms, creative spaces, social clubs and more are becoming increasingly popular as consumers look for ways to build community outside of their homes and offices.

At Glo30, Lamba said she has seen every customer base at the company’s locations, from families to girl groups to couples.

“The third room is interesting because it creates a real connection,” she said. “We witness someone’s life – their highs, their lows, their mids – and we are the constant, and that’s what the third room is all about to me: No matter what kind of day you’ve had out there, good, bad or mediocre, this room is yours. And when you come into this room, people will know you, see you, appreciate you and be glad you’re there.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Fox Information digitally eliminated Trump’s baseball cap. Disrespect for conflict useless in Iran at new propaganda low

Since the start of the Iran War, President Trump and his administration have casually ignored the fact that their chosen war will kill Americans.

The constant rejection and disregard for human life that has been and continues to be lost is rarely discussed in the mainstream media, but is often present in the comments of administration officials.

Previous presidential administrations have bristled at decisions they knew could cost American families their loved ones.

PoliticusUSA is non-partisan and beholden to no political party or special interest. Support us by becoming a subscriber.

There are stories dating back to Abraham Lincoln of presidents who struggled with the grief of sending U.S. troops to their deaths for the rest of their lives.

Military decisions are a matter of life and death and are among the most serious decisions a president will make during his term in office.

Even though it’s Donald Trump and the bar for his behavior is getting lower and lower, it was still shocking to see a president wearing a baseball cap that he sells show up to the troops who had lost their lives because of his decision to go to war with Iran.

This is how Trump appeared at the dignified ceremony to hand over the remains:

Trump was so disrespectful that Fox News decided to cover him up, which they did, after which the network was caught and had to admit that they had digitally inserted old footage of Trump to hide his disrespect for the war dead.

Read more below to see Fox’s admission.

Love Is Blind Season 10 Weddings: Who Bought Married?

Clay Gravesande and AD Smith: Broke up

While Clay expressed his reservations about marriage due to his own judgment of his father’s infidelity, AD assured him that they would make it as a couple and that everything seemed fine between the two.

But when faced with the task of saying at the altar I will forever, Clay instead said I won’t, telling AD that it wouldn’t be “responsible” for him to get married even though he knew he wasn’t ready.

Announce the shock.

“I’m going to put in the work for you,” he told AD, “and we’re going to get through this together. I don’t care what no one says; I know for a fact that I’m not ready for marriage and you deserve the best. And if I’m not ready to give you 100 percent, I won’t go there with you if I’m not ready… I can’t say yes now.”

It was a revelation that led AD to tearfully declare that the relationship was a waste of her “fucking time.”

As for Clay, he also revealed that financial – and emotional – ties played a big role in him leaving. “I looked at myself in the mirror and said, ‘Am I a husband?'” he admitted, “and the answer was no. Am I deeply in love? The answer was no.”

During the reunion, Clay expressed that he made a mistake and wanted to date AD, but she remained reticent about ever thinking about getting back together.

AD confessed that she went on a few dates with her co-star Matthew Duliba packed up after filming, but they are not together.

In May 2025, she announced that she was expecting her first child with her fiancé Ollie Sutherland.

We have been lively in buying and selling in the course of the aftermath of the Iran Struggle. Jim Cramer explains our method

Spanish Prime Minister Sánchez rejects Trump’s risk to cease all commerce

President of the Government Pedro Sanchez speaks during the official opening dinner of the Mobile World Congress (MWC) Barcelona 2026 at the Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya on March 1, 2026 in Barcelona, ​​Catalonia, Spain.

Europe Press News | Europa Press | Getty Images

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez stepped up his criticism of US attacks against Iran on Wednesday, describing the escalating Middle East conflict as a “catastrophe”.

His comments came after US President Donald Trump vowed to halt trade with Madrid after the Spanish government blocked the use of two jointly operated bases on its territory for the attacks.

“Spain was terrible,” Trump said Tuesday during a press conference at the White House alongside Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “We will cut off all trade with Spain. We want nothing to do with Spain,” he added.

In a televised address Wednesday morning, Sánchez said: “Great wars very often begin with a chain of events that spin out of control due to miscalculations, technical failures and unforeseen circumstances. That is why we must learn from history and cannot play Russian roulette with the fate of millions of people,” a CNBC translation said.

Sánchez warned against “repeating the mistakes of the past,” drew a comparison with the invasion of Iraq in the early 2000s and summarized the government’s position as “no to war.”

Spain’s socialist prime minister has become one of the leading critics of US and Israeli attacks against Iran among EU leaders.

Trump’s latest comments follow his condemnation of Madrid’s refusal to meet NATO’s defense spending target of 5% of GDP.

of Spain Capricorn 35 The index was trading 1.4% higher around 10:17 a.m. London time (5:17 a.m. ET), recouping earlier losses on jittery U.S. trading. Meanwhile, the pan-European Stoxx 600 index rose by around 1.2%.

Trump’s threat to punish Spain on trade would be a challenge given that the 27 EU states negotiate trade deals together.

“It is naive to believe that democracy or respect between nations can arise from ruins, or to believe that blind and submissive obedience is a form of leadership. On the contrary, I believe this position is leadership,” Sánchez said.

“We will not be complicit in something that is bad for the world and contrary to our values ​​and interests, just for fear of reprisals from others,” he added.

—CNBC’s Charlotte Reed contributed to this report.

After the assaults in Iran, Democrats are cautious about impeaching Trump

Representative Al Green shouts as President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on March 4, 2025.

Win Mcnamee | Via Reuters

Since the U.S. attack on Iran, Democrats in Congress and opponents of President Donald Trump have called the operation unconstitutional and vowed to rein in the president. But further impeachment – which the president fears if Democrats retake the US House of Representatives – has not entered serious discussion.

That could change after the midterm elections if the party wins the House of Representatives and Republicans lose their control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. Knowing he would be in Democrats’ crosshairs, Trump has expressed fear of a third impeachment trial to Republicans in Congress, telling them they must win in November.

“If you’re going to attack him, you want to make sure you don’t miss him,” Jared Leopold, a Democratic strategist who has worked on the Hill and for the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, said in an interview.

House Democrats met last week to hammer out strategy for this year. They met before the new Iran war – which Trump started without seeking congressional approval – provided another possible reason for impeachment.

Impeachment tends to be unpopular with voters, and there is concern in some parts of the Democratic establishment that previous attempts to rein in Trump have failed to gain traction. He was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives in 2019 over allegations that he withheld military aid to Ukraine to exert political pressure, and in 2021 over his actions leading up to the riots at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2020. Both times the Senate voted to acquit.

But if Democrats win back the House, there will likely be serious pressure to impeach Trump a third time. No other president has been impeached twice.

“We are not afraid of impeachment or any other constitutional tool in our arsenal, but we have learned that impeachment is not a panacea,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in an interview before the Iran operation.

“For us it’s not a fetish, but for us it’s not taboo either,” Raskin said. “If we believe this is the most effective way to address some of the crises facing the Republic that have been unleashed by President Trump or certain members of his Cabinet, then we need to think about it.”

Read more about CNBC’s politics coverage

Given that any talk of impeachment is purely symbolic and Republicans control both the House and Senate, Leopold said he doesn’t expect there to be an uptick in impeachment talk in the near term.

“You saw some come out in different places and usually use the ‘I word’ as some kind of attention-grabbing tool,” Leopold said. “More than anything, people want Democrats to push back in a way that has real-world impact.

While the attack on Iran did not prompt a flood of new calls for impeachment, Democrats have threatened to impeach Trump since Trump took office last year over his attacks on Iran in 2025, his overthrow of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro without congressional approval and a range of other alleged crimes.

Rep. Maxine Waters of California, who said before Maduro’s ouster in January that she would “reconsider” her view that it was now unrealistic to seek impeachment, is now rejecting any similar effort.

“I don’t want to go there. I think we’re focused on what’s happening in Iran,” Waters said Tuesday as she left a Trump administration briefing on the Iran operation. “I think when we take control of the House, we’ll think about it.”

“High Crimes and Crimes”

Calls for impeachment have emerged on the campaign trail in recent days, potentially foreshadowing what could be a contentious issue for Democrats in 2027.

In a crowded Democratic primary for the open seat in Illinois’ 9th Congressional District, three candidates demanded that Congress impeach and remove Trump.

“The morally bankrupt Trump administration teamed up with another morally bankrupt authoritarian to declare an unprovoked war on Iran that has already killed scores of civilians,” candidate Kat Abughazaleh posted on BlueSky. “We need an immediate vote in Congress on a War Powers Resolution. Then impeachment.”

Fellow candidates Evanston, Illinois Mayor Daniel K. Biss and state Sen. Laura Fine also called for Trump’s impeachment.

Before the attack on Iran, Democratic leaders considered how they could effectively rein in Trump without drowning out other issues. Party leaders have talked about prioritizing an affordability message, the same issue Republicans want Trump to focus on in the election year.

When Texas Rep. Al Green introduced a resolution to impeach Trump in December, only 140 Democrats voted against a motion to table the measure. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, whose leadership team chose not to seek votes for the resolution, was one of 47 Democrats who voted “present” and neither supported nor opposed the measure.

“What we tell our members and candidates who are running is that we have to do everything,” Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-California, said at the Democratic political retreat last week. “We need to provide oversight and accountability and talk about the affordability agenda and how we can improve people’s lives when we are given the opportunity to lead and when we are given the opportunity to govern.”

Rep. Deborah Ross, D-N.C., a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said at the retreat that a Democratic attempt at impeachment was all but certain. The problem, she said, will be figuring out on what grounds to impeach. Jeffries “won’t just be a freebie for everyone,” she said.

“I think the difficulty would be narrowing down the number of felonies and misdemeanors. Because I think there are a lot of felonies and misdemeanors,” Ross said.

A $Three trillion alternative for Black entrepreneurs is rising

Black and other minority entrepreneurs have a $3 trillion opportunity to become entrepreneurs through the Great Business Transfer, according to a new report from McKinsey.

“This is the largest ownership transfer in modern U.S. history,” said report co-author Shelley Stewart, senior partner and chair of the McKinsey Institute for Economic Mobility. “This is a great opportunity, but there is also a challenge. The problem is that many viable businesses may not be successfully transferred because the market to connect buyers, sellers and capital is not built at scale.”

Researchers predict that 6 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will be available for acquisition by 2035. If Black, Latino and women entrepreneurs can increase their stakes in these transforming companies, there is the potential to unlock $3 trillion in new household wealth, the report says.

McKinsey said the contrast between opportunity and risk is particularly stark for the black community.

Only 3% of U.S. entrepreneurs are Black, compared to 13% of the population. If current trends continue, Black entrepreneurs are expected to gain $87 billion in transferred business value. However, if they increase their participation in the Great Business Transfer, the figure could rise to over $369 billion. Conversely, without greater participation, wealth disparities would only widen, the report says.

Stewart added that the impact of transmission extends far beyond underrepresented communities.

“Success is achieved by having the broadest possible pool of entrepreneurs who can buy these companies. So that means you have to be inclusive,” Stewart said. “This is in the interest of all Americans. This impacts employment, it impacts local economic spending, it impacts wealth creation.”

Financing and business discovery

According to McKinsey, the biggest challenges for potential buyers in Black and other minority communities will be financing, accessing deal flow and navigating the advisory process in an acquisition.

“We have more Black check writers at venture capital firms and buyout firms than ever before,” said Jacob Walthour of Blueprint Capital Advisors. “We also work in other traditional financial institutions like banks, so the capital is there.”

But Walthour added that it is imperative for members of the Black and minority communities to understand the dynamics of acquiring a business versus starting a new business.

“You can get people to put capital into a business that already exists. One of the hardest things is raising capital to build that business,” Walthour said. “The basic principles of capitalism should always be in place, and that includes return on capital. This is how professional investors think about capital allocation.”

John Hope Bryant, founder and CEO of Operation Hope, also emphasized the need for Black entrepreneurs to seek opportunities in key industries rather than personal interests.

“You don’t have to fall in love with this business,” Bryant said. “Business is not personal. Once that change happens and you combine the hustle we have with the untapped ambition, you become a millionaire. We’ve never tried this boring, traditional approach.”

The planning process

The McKinsey report highlights five phases of a successful ownership transition: aspiration and preparation, search and sourcing, deal structuring and financing, ownership and value creation, and succession and exit.

Sheena Gray, CEO of the African American Advisors Association, said the transfer underscores the need for certified financial planners as, in many cases, potential buyers would be entering uncharted financial territory.

“The right planning infrastructure can be useful for expanding minority ownership in companies,” Gray said. “Certified financial planners are better able to structure tax strategies that will help someone when they want to strategically transition into ownership. It’s an important component that most business owners don’t think about when they talk about acquiring a new opportunity.”

Brandon William Jones, founder of Gravy Wealth, works with the National Black MBA Association to help professionals become entrepreneurs, a transition he calls from “earner” to “owner.”

“It’s more important now than ever to stay in control and capture the value you create,” Jones said. “The world is moving to a place where workers, especially knowledge workers, are now becoming optional.”

You have influence

McKinsey’s Stewart said the potential for disruption from AI only increases the potential for corporate acquisitions.

“What’s in the 6 million businesses? There’s retail, there’s restaurants, there’s construction, there’s healthcare. There’s small manufacturing businesses. Those will certainly be impacted by AI, but these are labor-intensive businesses that continue to need workers,” Stewart said. “AI will play a role in helping entrepreneurs become smart across various industries. AI is unlikely to make these companies obsolete.”

“It’s going to be a question of whether we can create the market mechanism that connects companies to entrepreneurs and capital. I actually think we could see an acceleration in the next decade if we can bring together the infrastructure that actually gets people to buy these companies.”

Jones also said that AI can also be an important tool for reducing wealth and ownership disparities: “If someone advances AI, not only can they potentially acquire that company, but they can also implement the AI ​​playbook to drive much more efficiency and value.”

Lifetime Gifting Methods – Good Methods to Switch Wealth Whereas Lowering Property Taxes

Lifetime gifting strategies are not just about taxes. They are about control, timing, and helping people you care about while you are still here to see the impact. For many families, waiting until death to transfer wealth creates missed opportunities, financially and emotionally. Strategic gifting during your lifetime can reduce estate taxes, support long-term financial goals, and shape how future generations manage money.

The core idea is simple: moving assets out of your taxable estate gradually while helping family members today. The execution, however, requires planning, awareness of tax rules, and a clear understanding of long-term legacy goals.

Why Lifetime Gifting Strategies Matter for Legacy Planning

Estate planning often focuses on wills, trusts, and what happens after someone passes away. Lifetime gifting flips that mindset. Instead of waiting, you begin transferring wealth during your lifetime.

There are several reasons this approach is powerful:

  • Gifts reduce the overall size of your taxable estate.
  • Future appreciation happens outside your estate once assets are transferred.
  • Family members can use funds during meaningful life stages, like for education, housing, or business growth.
  • You maintain the ability to guide and observe how wealth is used.

From a tax standpoint, lifetime gifting strategies help manage exposure to federal estate taxes. In 2026, the federal lifetime gift and estate tax exemption is about $15 million per individual (roughly $30 million for married couples)1. Transfers above that level may face tax rates up to 40%.

Even families below these thresholds can benefit from gifting because tax laws change. Planning early creates flexibility.

Understanding the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion

One of the most practical tools in lifetime gifting strategies is the annual exclusion.

Currently, individuals can gift up to $19,000 per recipient per year2 without triggering gift tax or using any portion of the lifetime exemption.

This creates a simple framework:

  • Parents can gift each child $19,000 annually.
  • Grandparents can gift multiple grandchildren separately.
  • Married couples can “split gifts,” potentially doubling the amount to $38,000 per recipient.

The long-term impact is often underestimated. Consistent annual gifting over decades can remove significant wealth from an estate without complex structures.

Example:

A couple with three children and four grandchildren could transfer hundreds of thousands of dollars each year while remaining within annual limits. Over ten years, that can equate to a substantial shift in estate value.

Direct Payments That Don’t Count as Taxable Gifts

Another underused strategy involves direct payments for specific expenses.

Payments made directly to educational institutions for tuition or to medical providers for qualifying medical expenses generally do not count toward annual gift limits.

This means grandparents or parents can support education or healthcare without using annual exclusions or lifetime exemptions. The key detail is that payments must go directly to the provider, not to the individual receiving support.

For families focused on legacy gifts for grandchildren, this approach combines generosity with tax efficiency.

Using Lifetime Exemption Strategically

Beyond annual gifting, larger transfers can be made using the lifetime gift tax exemption.

When gifts exceed the annual exclusion, they typically reduce your remaining lifetime exemption rather than triggering immediate tax. Gift tax only becomes payable once cumulative gifts exceed the exemption amount.

Why would someone use this?

Because transferring appreciating assets early can be powerful.

Consider assets such as:

  • Closely held business interests
  • Real estate with growth potential
  • Investment portfolios expected to appreciate

When these assets are gifted earlier, future growth happens outside the original owner’s estate. Over time, that difference can significantly reduce estate tax exposure.

Timing matters. Waiting until later in life often means transferring a higher asset value and potentially higher tax exposure.

Trust-Based Gifting Strategies

Lifetime gifting does not always mean handing assets directly to beneficiaries. Many families use trust structures to maintain oversight and protect assets.

Common reasons for gifting through trusts:

  • Control over when beneficiaries access funds
  • Protection from creditors or divorce risk
  • Structured distributions for education or milestones
  • Tax-efficient wealth growth

Trusts can also address emotional concerns around gifting. Some people hesitate to transfer large sums because they worry about misuse. Structured trusts allow wealth transfer while preserving guidance.

Supporting Family Today Without Losing Financial Security

A common hesitation around lifetime gifting strategies is fear of giving too much too early.

That concern is valid.

Effective planning starts by answering three questions:

  1. What level of income do you need to maintain your lifestyle?
  2. How much flexibility do you want for future healthcare or long-term care?
  3. How comfortable are you with permanently transferring assets?

Gifting should align with long-term financial projections. The goal is not maximizing tax savings at the expense of personal security.

For some families, gifting smaller annual amounts consistently is more comfortable than large one-time transfers.

Common Mistakes in Lifetime Gifting

Even simple strategies can create problems if done without planning.

Typical mistakes include:

  • Forgetting to track cumulative gifts against lifetime exemptions.
  • Giving highly appreciated assets without considering cost basis implications.
  • Unequal gifting among heirs without clear communication, creating family conflict.
  • Transferring assets needed later for income or liquidity.

Another issue is assuming gift tax applies immediately. Most people never pay gift tax because the lifetime exemption is large. However, documentation and reporting rules still apply.

The Role of Education in Long-Term Legacy Planning

Lifetime gifting is not only financial, but also behavioral. Many families use gifting as a way to teach financial responsibility.

Examples include:

  • Matching contributions toward savings goals.
  • Funding investment accounts with educational oversight.
  • Helping with down payments while setting expectations.

This transforms gifting from a simple transfer into a structured legacy-building strategy.

A Balanced Perspective from Financial Thought Leadership

Some wealth management firms have published thoughtful breakdowns of lifetime gifting strategies and tax-efficient wealth transfer planning. For example, a blog post, Tax Friendly Wealth Transfer Strategies, by Fragasso Financial Advisors, a Pittsburgh-based wealth management firm, outlines how annual exclusion gifts, direct payments for qualified expenses, and structured planning approaches can work together to reduce estate size while supporting family goals. Their discussion is useful because it presents both the technical rules and the broader legacy considerations, offering readers another viewpoint on how lifetime gifting fits into long-term planning decisions.

Building a Tax-Efficient Legacy Through Lifetime Gifting Strategies

Lifetime gifting strategies work best when aligned with broader financial goals:

  • Retirement income planning
  • Asset allocation and risk management
  • Family values around wealth and responsibility
  • Long-term tax efficiency

There is no single approach that is suitable for all. Some families focus on steady annual gifts. Others combine trusts, large lifetime transfers, and education-focused payments.  It is recommended to work with your tax professional and financial advisor to determine if the strategies discussed here are appropriate for you and your unique circumstances.

The real value comes from intentional planning. Supporting family today while reducing future tax exposure is not just a financial decision, it is a legacy decision. By using lifetime gifting strategies thoughtfully, individuals can shape how wealth is transferred, reduce potential tax burdens, and create a smoother transition across generations without waiting until the end of life to make an impact.

Investment advice offered by investment advisor representatives through Fragasso Financial Advisors, a registered investment advisor.

1-https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/10/irs-announces-increased-gift-and-estate-tax-exemption-amounts-for-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com

2-https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/whats-new-estate-and-gift-tax?utm_source=chatgpt.com