News
Test

Residents Evaluate Fire Damage

Fire Camp Is Its Own Little Village

Red Cross Coordinating Aid for Fire Victims

Say Bye To Bella Vista Eyesore

Newborn Filly Recovering After Attack

Defense: Sobriety Tests Fumbled

Death Penalty Showdown

Deputy May Have Taken Evidence

A Beeline From the Trigo Fire

More
News

HOME	CLASSIFIEDS	OBITUARIES	SPORTS	OPINION

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Death Penalty Showdown

By Joline Gutierrez Krueger
Journal Staff Writer
      The much anticipated showdown over the death penalty at the state Supreme Court may be over before it begins.
       The Attorney General's Office is expected to file its response this week opposing an appeal sought by defense attorneys of state District Judge Neil Candelaria's decision to keep the death penalty in play in the case against Michael Paul Astorga, who is accused of killing a deputy.
       Both defense attorneys and prosecutors said they had hoped that a decision by the state's highest court before Astorga went to trial, rather than afterward, could help define how better to proceed with the case and with death penalty cases in the future.
       “We are saying, let's figure out what's right and what's wrong and save the taxpayers a lot of money and the victims' families a lot of grief now rather than go through a whole trial only to have to do it again,” Bernalillo County District Attorney Kari Brandenburg said.
       Her office is prosecuting Astorga in the March 2006 shooting death of Bernalillo County Sheriff's Deputy James McGrane Jr. during a traffic stop in the East Mountains.
       But Steven Suttle, special counsel with the Attorney General's Office, said the appeal is premature.
       The grounds for the appeal, he said, do not meet the necessary criteria for such an appeal before the case is resolved because it is not “dispositive” of the case, meaning that a ruling one way or the other will not decide it.
       “Regardless of whether the Supreme Court affirms Judge Candelaria's decision or overrules it, the case is not going to go away,” Suttle said. “Our position is an interlocutory appeal is inappropriate at this time.”
       Suttle also said similar arguments could be made during the automatic appeal that would be generated should Astorga be convicted and sentenced to death.
       The state Supreme Court has the final say on whether to hear the appeal, but attorneys on both sides of the issue say they are concerned that the AG's stance could thwart their hopes of obtaining a definitive decision from the state's highest court on the complexities of the death penalty.
       “I respect what the Attorney General's Office believes it must do, but this is an issue that needs to be resolved in New Mexico,” Brandenburg said.
       The Attorney General's Office handles all cases for the state during the appellate process.
       Public defenders for Astorga, 31, had sought the application for an interlocutory appeal after Candelaria denied their motion in March to dismiss the death penalty on the grounds it is unconstitutional.
       If the Supreme Court sides with the Attorney General's Office, the case would be sent back to Candelaria for trial.
   

---